體驗區

免費試讀請先加入會員並下載瀏覽軟體

詳目顯示
回簡目顯示 下ㄧ筆         閱讀
篇名 國民小學校長創新領導與組織氣氛關係之研究──以桃園市為例
並列篇名 The Research of the Relationship Between principals’ innovative leadership and Organizational Climate of Elementary School Teachers in Taoyuan City
作者 林和春(Lin,Ho-Chun) 、康惠雅(Kang,Hui-Ya)
中文摘要 本研究以桃園市做為實徵研究範疇,探討和評析國民小學校長創新領導與學校組織氣氛的關係,研究方法採問卷調查法,以「桃園市國民小學校長創新領導與組織氣氛關係調查問卷」為施測工具。研究結論和建議歸納如下:一、當前國民小學校長創新領導表現達中上程度,以「學生展能創新」層面較佳,而在「資源運用創新」方面表現相對較低;二、國民小學校長創新領導與學校組織氣氛呈正相關,組織氣氛以「開放型」最佳;三、國民小學教師常會因「現任職務」及「學校規模」的不同,對於自己學校校長創新領導的知覺有所差異。四、國民小學教師常會因「性別」、「年齡」、「服務年資」、「現任職務」及「學校規模」的不同,對於自己學校組織氣氛知覺上有所差異。五、國民小學校長創新領導能有效預測學校組織氣氛。
英文摘要 This research study aimed to detect the correlation between principal’s innovative leadership and organizational climate of elementary school teachers in Taoyuan City. A questionnaire, termed “the relationship between principal’s innovative leadership and organizational climate of elementary school teachers”, was adopted to collect empirical data for further statistical analysis. Results and implications of the study were summarized below: (1) Middle to higher levels of innovative leadership were significantly correlated with students’ creativity, whereas non-significantly correlated with the dimension of “utilization of resources for creativity”. (2) Positive correlations were found between principal’s innovative leadership and organizational climate; significant correlation was detected between principal’s innovative leadership and the “openness” dimension under the organizational climate construct. (3) Teachers’ perceptions towards principal’s innovative leadership differed significantly as a function of their position titles and school sizes. (4) Teachers’ perceptions towards school climate differed as a function of their gender, age, years of service, position titles and school sizes. (5) Principal’s innovative leadership was found to be a predictor of school climate.
頁次 194-220
關鍵詞 國民小學 校長創新領導 學校組織氣氛 elementary school principal’s innovative leadership school organizational climate
卷期 4:11
日期 201511
刊名 臺灣教育評論月刊
出版單位 臺灣教育評論學會